2019 Nordica Enforcer 110 Ski Review: // Ski Reviews
Happy New Year! To celebrate the New Year we thought we would jump ahead to the future and review a 2019 ski! We know, we know, that sounds crazy. Part of the reason why we chose to do this particular ski is the 2018 Enforcer 110 is almost entirely sold out and Nordica has done an early release of the 2019 version, which is the same ski through and through, just with different graphics. That being said, we will begin to focus more on 2019 products as next year's skis will be unveiled very soon at ski industry trade shows and on-snow demos. So keep an eye out for more 2019 reviews, and in the meantime check out this new ski from Nordica.
The Nordica Enforcer 100 has become one of the most popular skis on the market in the past few seasons. Chances are you've seen them on your local hill regardless of where you might live or ski. Skiers love its blend of performance: smooth, damp, quiet and powerful, yet maneuverable, relatively forgiving, and super versatile. For 2017 Nordica added another Enforcer to the collection, the Enforcer 93. Both skis continue to impress in reviews and ski tests across the board. For the 2018 season Nordica has added two more skis to the collection, the Enforcer 110 and the Enforcer Pro. We've had a great start to the season here in Stowe, VT and luckily we've had some chances to get out on the Enforcer 110 and put it to the test in a variety of snow conditions.
Before we dive into performance let's take a look at where the Enforcer 110 draws its influence from a design perspective. Essentially if you take the Enforcer 100 and the now-outdated Patron and smash them together you get the Enforcer 110. The rocker profile is largely derived from the Patron. It has significantly more tail rocker than the Enforcer 100 and 93 and higher rise rocker in both the tip and tail. The sidecut and tip shape, however, are taken more from the Enforcer series than the Patron, which is where we start to see significant changes. The blunt nose is a proven design thanks to the success of the Enforcer 100 and 93. It engages a turn really smoothly, feels very catch-free, and the further you tip the ski on edge the more contact you're getting with the snow. This allows for seemingly endless ski styles, turn shapes, etc. You can ski a flatter ski and it feels very maneuverable or you can lay it on edge and get a really powerful feel with strong edge grip. The construction of the new Enforcer 110 is also similar to the Enforcer 100, although it's a bit lighter. The Enforcer 110 uses their Energy 2 Ti Balsa core. It integrates balsa into the core alongside poplar and beech, which is sandwiched between the same metal found in the rest of the Enforcer line. The idea is to give the ski good damping and the quiet, energy-absorbing feel of metal, while being a little bit lighter and a touch softer than the 100.
I've had 5-6 days on the Enforcer 110 so far. I've skied both the 185 and 191 cm lengths. On paper the 185 cm is probably the right size for me as an aggressive skier around 5'10" and about 150 lbs, but I actually do like both lengths, which I'll get to later. Let's break this down into different snow types, starting with groomers. It feels a little silly talking about a 110 mm width ski's performance on groomers, but in today's day and age most skiers expect a little bit of groomer performance out of a ski this wide. Advances in technology have allowed ski manufacturers to give a ski more torsional stiffness, which in turn has given wider skis better performance on firm snow and this Enforcer 110 is a great example.
If you've skied an Enforcer 100 you already basically know how the Enforcer 110 is going to feel on groomers because it really is very similar. It's a little bit slower edge to edge, but it's barely noticeable. The torsional stiffness feels about the same as the ski really can hold an edge impressively well on firm snow. Even the turn shape is similar as the Enforcer 93, 100, and 110 all share the same turn radii. The flex of the Enforcer 110 does feel a little different, however. Underfoot it feels about the same in terms of stiffness, but the tips and tails do feel softer. It gives the ski a slightly more playful feel and I found it was maybe a little bit easier to manipulate turn shape compared to the Enforcer 100, specifically different shaped carving turns. You can really get the Enforcer 110 to flex, which allows you to make short radius, rounded carves. This does require some skier input as you do need to get the ski to flex quite a bit to achieve this. On the other hand, just like the Enforcer 100, you can give it a little less input and arc bigger carving turns with great stability. The tips and tails of the Patron used to bounce around a little bit, which doesn't happen nearly as much on the Enforcer 110. Instead it stays pretty smooth, calm, and collected during high speed groomer runs. It doesn't really feel like it has a speed limit on groomers, at least if it does I haven't found it.
Off the groomers is where you really start to feel a different between the Enforcer 110 and 100. The 110's balsa core and thinner metal do give it a noticeably lighter feel. Even for myself on the 191 cm ski it felt pretty easy to throw around. We have some tight tree runs here in Stowe and I half expected the 191 cm to be downright annoying in tight trees, but thankfully it's not at all. The rocker profile makes the ski easy to pivot, which for me was very confidence inspiring as it meant I could ski a more direct line and quickly dump speed here and there to retain control. That's very much my ski style and I think a style that the Enforcer 110 enjoys: direct, down-the-fall line with quick slashes and smears for speed control. The 185 cm does feel more appropriate in these tight tree runs, but I was genuinely impressed by the maneuverability of the 191 cm. The ski's willingness to release its tail edge really is quite noticeable both on groomed and ungroomed terrain. It's pretty amazing how quick you can get the Enforcer 110 to turn considering its two sheets of metal. I've been on other 190+ skis with two sheets of metal that constantly feel like they're fighting you. The Enforcer 110 has that strong, burly feel, but is so easy to skid and smear when you want to.
Image Courtesy of Evan Williams
In powder I really, really enjoyed skiing the Enforcer 110. It just has such a smooth feel to it. Nordica really has something special with the tip shape of the Enforcer series. It feels supportive and has plenty of float, yet you can feel the ski sinking into the snow in such a way that you really feel in control. Weight the ski a little differently and you can get it to sink or float in deep snow, which I found made it easy to control speed. I'm admittedly the type of skier that can get a little carried away on a powder day. I'll take 2 or 3 Super G style turns and then realize I'm going way too fast for comfort. On the Enforcer 110 I feel like I can get the ski to shed speed just by giving it a little gas pedal and getting the ski to make a deeper turn. I also think the 110 mm waist width helps with this. It's not so wide that you're just skipping and skimming across everything. Even at the 191 cm length at my weight I felt like I was in the snow, not on the snow, something that I personally look for in a powder ski. That being said, the tips never dived under the snow. While part of the tip of the ski would sink allowing me to easily control speed, the very end of the ski never came close to diving under the snow.
Let's talk a little bit about length. I think what length you choose in this ski should depend on how you plan to use it. I really like skiing the 191 cm ski, but I like skiing it fast. I enjoy that I can point it down the fall line and go regardless of snow conditions. Like I said I'm the type of skier who gets a little carried away, and a 191 cm Enforcer 110 allows me to do that. Truth be told, however, the 185 cm feels like the right length. It's easy to maneuver here in our tight Vermont trees and still is plenty of ski for high speed skiing. I think I will continue to ski both lengths as we get more opportunities to test this ski. If I were heading out west for a trip I'd probably just throw the 191 cm in my bag. If I had to choose just one length for myself to do everything, however, I'd be going with the 185 cm.
So who's this ski for? Just like the Enforcer 100 we think it's very appropriate for a wide range of skiers. Anyone who has ever skied an Enforcer 100 and thought they would like a wider version, here you go! We also think there will be a new crop of skiers who pick up an Enforcer 110 who didn't necessarily ski an Enforcer 100 because it does have a slightly more playful feel. The twin tip shape means you could in theory mount it as a backcountry freeride/freestyle ski with a more forward mount point. Along the same line we think there are certain skiers who will buy an Enforcer 110 as a dedicated powder ski. For myself, living in northern Vermont, that's basically what it would be. Western skiers, however, could easily justify making it their daily driver thanks to its blend of performance across different snow conditions and terrain. Whatever type of skier you are and however you decide to ski it, we think Nordica definitely has another winner here and is continuing the trend of high performance Enforcer skis.
Very good comprehensive review. My only disagreement is the graphics. It looks to me like they just spilled paint on the 2019 110 whereas the black (with a little green) on the Pro is, IMO, a much better looking design- almost Head Koreish.
Always appreciate your great reviews. Hope we get some of that good snow that you have been enjoying out here in CO. Haven't been able to try out the Cochises that I bought from you yet. Can't wait to get on them.
Thanks
Hey Scott!
When you see the entire 2019 Enforcer collection together the graphics make more sense. They essentially designed them to go together well on a ski wall. I have mixed feelings about the black and red graphic, but others have voiced that they really like it. I agree with you that the Enforcer Pro looks awesome and steals the award for "best looking Enforcer" by a long shot, but not everyone agrees with us!
We'll do our best to send some snow out your way!
SE
Looks like a good ski but why are all your skiers in the photos of the so rotated over their skisyou I would think that they would display some counter rotation -upper body separation
Not the best display of solid sking
Brennan
Hi CB!
Sometimes photos don't do the skier justice. We apologize if we're not good enough at skiing for your taste. If you'd like to come to Stowe we can include you in a review video sometime!
SE
Thanks for the review! You guys always do a great job and I enjoy all of the videos and articles.
I've been on blizzard Bonafides at 180cm the past 2 years. (Ski out West in CA/CO). How would you say the Nordica 110s at 185cm compare? I'm interested in finding a ski with a a little more versatility....especially in deeper snow and the trees. Unfortunately I've never been able to demo any of the enforcer line.
Hi Dave!
The Enforcer 110 is definitely softer flexing in the tips and tails than the Bones. There's also more rocker, both in the tip and tail. The combination of that and the width of the Enforcer 110 gives it much better performance and a more forgiving, maneuverable feel in soft now than the Bonafide. You can release the tail edge a lot easier, which makes it more confidence inspiring in tighter terrain like trees. I think it would be a pretty cool compliment to the Bonafide!
Hope that helps!
SE
Great review. I'd like to pick up the Enforcer 110 but am kind of stuck between sizes. 5'8" and 155lbs advanced skier skiing the PNW. Would you recommend the 177 or 185. Currently ski the Line Supernatural in a 179, but towards the end of the day when the legs are shot its a lot of work. Wondering if the 177 Enforcer would be a bit easier with tired legs but not give up too much stability. Tougjts?
Hi John!
Yeah, I think the 177 cm will work nicely for you. A 185 cm Enforcer 110 is going to be even more tiring over a long day of skiing than your current skis. It's a really stable feeling ski, so I don't think you'll find the 177 cm too short. The 185 cm would be fun at your size for just straight-lining and charging down the fall line, but I think you'll find the 177 cm a little more user-friendly.
SE
Hi there love your reviews...
also a question....
5‘10“ 160lbs
advanced skier and riding a faction dictator 180cm...
not sure to go with a 177 or 185 enforcer 110?
cheers from switzerland;)
HI Reto!
I think 177 is the way to go unless you're skiing super-fast and aggressively. Overall the shorter size seems to fit your stats. Have fun!
SE
Thx a lot ;)))
a last question... recommended mount point or going bit forward?
Hi Guys
Thanks for the candid reviews
I have an Enforcer 110 size question
Looking to replace my 2012 Bibby pro's 184
I like the quickness of the Bibby vs my groomer ski, the Bonafide 190
I'm just under 6' and 200+, a strong but older skier at the steeper resorts in Tahoe
I like a quick swing weight, edge holding ski when dropping in chutes and fast turning in trees.
My question with the Enforcer 110 is, what does the 191 really ski like with rocker tip and tail, is it going to feel long in heavy crud snow like my Bonafides or just as quick or quicker as my Bibby 184? Your thoughts on the correct size for me?
LMK Thx
Hi Jordan!
The Enforcer 110 will definitely ski shorter than your Bonafide. Do you have the 187 cm? I don't remember 190 cm. That being said, the 191 cm Enforcer 110 will still feel more maneuverable and skis shorter than a 187 cm Bonafide. It might not be quite as maneuverable as your Bibby Pros, but close, and will probably feel a little more stable to you. Having spent some time on the 191 cm myself and coming in at 5'10" 150 lbs I think you'll be just fine on the 191 cm Enforcer 110. It's a super fun ride!
SE
John- I am 225 @ 6ft tall. I currently ski the Enforcer 93 - 185 and love the ski. I am looking at the 110 for more than a foot of powder and in tight trees in the West. What length do you recommend?
I am 6' 180 lbs and have skid the 2011/2012 Enforcers 177cm for the last 7 years. Told myself I would get new skis this year so I went with the Enforcer 110 at 185cm. I knew I needed longer skis but unfortunately I didn't read this review until after I purchased. Worried that 191cm may suit me better... Advanced / expert skier mostly ski in Colorado with occasional trips to the PNW. Love bombing it down groomers but also live in the trees. Would you recommend 191cm? Wondering if I should consider returning / exchanging. Buyers remorse!
Cheers,
Sean
Hi Steve!
Do you ever feel like your Enforcer 93 is too short? If the answer is no, I would get the 185 cm Enforcer 110. It does have more tail rocker, so arguably skis a tiny bit shorter, but there's more material simply because its wider, so I don't necessarily think you should size up on it compared to an Enforcer 93 or 100. Intended terrain plays into it too, however. If you're the type of skier that likes high speeds, big sweeping turns, and aggressive skiing through deep snow you might want to go 192 cm to get a little more stability at those really high speeds, but if that doesn't sound like you I'd stick with the 185 cm.
SE
Hi Sean!
I wouldn't necessarily have buyers remorse if I were you. In fact, 185 cm could definitely be the right length for you. Have you skied them yet? If you haven't I would definitely ski them before you really start to think too much about it. My guess is you're going to like the 185 cm length. You're getting quite a bit more ski compared to your old 177 cm Enforcers.
Worst case scenario you ski them and decide you want a longer ski. The Enforcer 110 is going to be pretty popular over the next couple years we're guessing, so it would be pretty easy to sell a 185 cm with some holes drilled in it for a good amount of money. That's what I would do.
If you have skied the 185 cm let me know what you were feeling and why you're wondering about moving to the 191 cm.
SE
Hey,
I was wondering if this ski would work for me. I am 5'8 150 and I live in the northeast. I have a pair of rossagnal e74 that I want to keep them and use those as a groomer ski. I in intended to use the enforcer 110 for most of the time except icy stuff and days I plan to ski a lot of groomed runs. But use it off pist a lot and on pist about 60% off trail to 40% on trail. Looking for a sidecountry, trees and moguls ski and on trail too. Would you recommend this or maybe somthing else?
Thanks
I forgot to mention I like a playful ski and something I can send cliffs whit.
I also want something smeary and pivoty.
Hey Shane!
I think the Enforcer 110 could definitely work for you. It's quite a bit "more ski" than your E74s, but as long as you know what you're getting I think it could definitely play that role for you. Keep in mind, however, that the Enforcer 110 does use two sheets of metal. It's on the heavier side compared to some skis in this width category, but it's definitely smeary and pivoty, definitely is a blast for dropping cliffs, and is a pretty playful shape with plenty of tip and tail rocker and kind of a twin tip design. You might not need to go that wide, however. It's definitely up to you as ski width is very much personal preference, but as an east coast ski it's not the most versatile due to width. The Enforcer 100, or even something a little lighter like the Salomon QST 99, Rossi Sky 7 HD, Atomic Backland FR 102 could all work too if you decide you don't want to go that wide or decide you don't need that much metal.
Hope that helps!
SE
Any chance you can elaborate on the difference between the 191 110's and the Pro's at 115? Im looking for that resort ski for smaller powder days and the day after. I ski mostly Squaw. I'm not the fastest anymore, but these young kids don't blow by me either! I'm trying to bridge the gap between a 17/18 187 Bonafide and a K2 Pon2oon. Yeah, I know huge gap. I have an OG Cochise in 185 that has gone to rock duty. I'm looking for the chargieness of the Cochise with the fun and float of the pon2oon. Does the Enforcer pro fit this gap, or would you recommend something else? I was leaning toward a Rustler 11 but they just felt too soft to me.
Hey Bob!
Did you watch the video? At the end I talk a fair amount about the differences between the 110 and the Pro. And there's some footage of me almost eating it on the Pro... 😉
It's definitely stiffer and more stable when you're just charging. I would say it has Cochise level chargieness, not quite the same float as a Pon2oon, but definitely good float. I think the rocker profile really helps with float too: long, smooth rocker. And the tip shape never feels catchy, so definitely feels floaty and smooth in powder. I definitely think the Enforcer Pro feels stiffer and burlier than the Rustler 11, more of a direct comparison to the Bodacious in my opinion.
Hope that helps!
SE
Well, I owe a follow up to my questions about the Enforcer Pro. I just spent 2 days skiing them in Tahoe during and after a nice suprise 12" storm. I cant compare to any other Enforcer, because I haven't ridden any. That being said, they are one heck of an all around ski. The tips are spectacular, always want to float up and ride on top, but not at all soft or flappy. Really easy ski to ride, but don't get back at all or they will try to buck you. You get back what you give them, the harder you drive the ski and the faster you go, the better it performs, but they can still be ridden slow and perform well, as long as you stay forward. Because of the stiffness, especially underfoot, they really bite well when encountering hard snow like in a chute or steep section. They blast through chopped stuff, and lay down good arcs on the groomed. Only place they don't excel is in tight, firm bumps, but then what 115 waist, 191 cm, stiff ski does? Probably not the ski for everyone, but if you know how to drive a ski and have good fundamentals, you will really enjoy the Enforcer Pro in more than just powder. Oh, and it has that distinctive metal "tink" sound that I just love to hear in a ski..
I am a big guy at 6'5" and 330 lbs. I am looking at either the Enforcer 110 (or Pro) in 191 or the Blizzard Bonafide in 187. I am an intermediate/advanced skier and like to play in the trees as well as the powder out here in Colorado. I ski blue and black moguls but they are not something I seek out. I would rather put around in the off trail stuff if I can. I ski groomers with my friends and wife and max out speed wise at about 40 mph.I would like to work up to skiing more off-trail stuff and start working into the bowls. What ski would you recommend for someone with my height, weight and skiing style? Thanks.
Hi Mark W!
I'm leaning towards the Enforcer 110. I think that ski will give you really good performance for the terrain you ski and will be stiff enough and stable enough for you without feeling too challenging for your ability level. At your size the flex of the Pro is a little more manageable than for lighter skiers, but it's still a pretty stiff, pretty demanding ski. I think the flex of the 110 is more appropriate, and they're essentially the same shape so your getting very, very similar ability out of the ski. The Bonafide I don't think would have the performance you're looking for for softer snow, and it uses less rocker (especially in the tail) so is a little more demanding in terms of skier input. I think you'll enjoy a 191 cm Enforcer 110 quite a bit.
Hope that helps!
SE
Hi,
I'm an east coast, expert level aggressive skier 5'10, 170lbs. Currently using the 2018 enforcer 93 177 as my daily driver. I love the 93 (this ski rips) but looking to purchase a fatter ski for our rare powder days and my trips out west. Besides the width difference, how do these skis ride in comparison to each other in terms of maneuverability, float, stiffness? Since this isn't a ski I'll be using all too often I want to ensure that it will be able to handle a good amount of snow and will allow me to charge down the mountain in soft conditions. If I'm a big fan of the 93 is it worth buying another nordica ski, the 110, or do you have any other recommendations of similar skis catered towards soft snow that would fit my style?
Hi Dan!
The Enforcer 110 is a lot of fun and definitely has some significant differences from the 93. It's even easier to release the tail edge thanks to the longer, higher rise tail rocker, so in my opinion the 110 feels more maneuverable. It's definitely easier to pivot and smear, especially when things get deep. The 110 floats much better than the 93, which plays into that maneuverability for sure. I also think the tip shape and rocker profile works really well in deep snow. It feels predictable when you're sinking into the snow a little bit, never catchy. It's also a little bit softer flexing. It's not a drastic difference, but it is softer.
I think adding a 110 to compliment your 93 is a great move. It has the same overall "feel," which we know you already like, but is different enough that their performance doesn't cross over each other, if that makes sense. The 110 is my personal powder ski and I love it. I also think you could consider getting it in the 185 cm length instead of 177 cm. Boost the float a little bit, and the extra tail rocker makes it pretty manageable.
Hope that helps!
SE
Hi and thanks for the great reviews. I spent about a week on the Enforcer 100 at the end of the season and was liking it a lot, so smooth and easy to ski. I'm 6'1, 155, expert and I was skiing the 185. I ski 95% off-piste in Colorado. The snow was pretty thin this year, so had many days on skied-out hard terrain. I know the 110 is more of a powder oriented ski, but I'm wondering if you could comment on it's off-piste, harder snow chops. I like the forgiveness and stability of the 100, but it also felt a bit short at times when pushing hard on steep terrain. I'm thinking I would like the added width and length of the 110 at 191. I'd be looking to use it as my only ski, and it sounds like it will handle pow just fine. I do ski a lot of tight trees, but think I would rather have the length for stability when charging. It sounds like the 110 can also be dialed back for more playful slower turns. Here are some other skis I'm familiar with, in case you can throw in a comparison: Blizzard Rustler 10 188-104 width. ON3P Billy Goat 184-115 width. Thanks!
Hi Aaron!
The Enforcer 110 definitely stays pretty stable through choppy, chunked up, inconsistent, or firm off-piste conditions. That's actually one of my favorite things about it. I'm about your weight, but a little shorter. I played around with skiing both the 185 and 191 this year. What I love about the 191 is that I can point it down the fall line and know I'll end up at the bottom of whatever I'm on. I might come out of it at warp speed, but I'll be on my feet. I didn't get that same sense of limitless speed through variable snow on the 185 cm, it doesn't track quite as well at high speeds, and I mean the kind of speed when you're just skipping over all the little bumps in the snow and realistically probably only actually on the snow half the time. Sounds like you probably ski fairly similarly, so I think you'd prefer the 191 cm. It'll also be a bit easier for you in tight spots than it is for me just because you have a few inches, thus more leverage.
The Rustler 10 is super fun, but doesn't have that same limitless stability even in the longest length. The tips and tails feel softer and lighter, so it can get kicked around a bit at high speeds. I haven't actually skied the Billy Goat, unfortunately, so can't comment there. From everything you've said I think you'd really like a 191 cm Enforcer 110. There may be moments when you wish you had something shorter on your feet, but I bet there will be many more moments when you're thankful for the stability it provides.
Hope that helps!
SE
Hi,
Had to follow up on this a year later. I landed up going with the 185 and it has become my favorite ski. I did first get the 191 and spent quite a few days on it, for big open terrain and hard charging it was fantastic. I spend most of my days in Crested Butte and decided that something more maneuverable in tight trees and steep rocky terrain would be a bit more fun. The 185 Enforcer 110 is just right, I don't mind the slight loss of stability at top speed for the trade-off in agility and a bit more play-fullness.
So I'm on the hunt for the classic 'all-mountain ski' (mostly for Colorado). I'm 5'7", 135lbs, fairly athletic, and skiing all types of terrain from choppy groomers to knee-deep powder (that's about 1' and a some inches on me). The plan is make whatever ski I end up with both a resort and a backcountry getup. I've skied on the Enforcer 100 (at 169cm) at Whistler/Blackcomb and I absolutely loved them. Haven't skied a better ski yet. I could take them on insanely choppy runs or through to hike terrain. The Enforcer 100s satisfied all of my needs up to that nice fresh powder, only because I never got to try them out on it. The only ski that I've really tried any wider than 102 was the Soul 7, which I did not particularly like, mostly because I found myself unable to push them around quickly and playfully. Thus, the question is, do you think, given that the Enforcer 110s aren't much heavier than the 100s and have a similar turning radius, that I should go for the 110s as something I can take down groomers, into trees, AND hike into the backcountry or stick with the 100s?
Hi David!
I think that's a bit of a toss up. The extra width of the Enforcer 110 does make it little slower edge to edge and not quite as snappy as the 100. I wouldn't necessarily say an Enforcer 110 will feel easier to maneuver than the Soul 7 either. It's a little heavier than the Soul, and it's also wider, so more ski all around. Considering you tried the Enforcer 100 and liked it, but didn't like the Soul, I wonder if you're really just feeling a difference in width more than anything else. That makes me worry that you'd feel the same way on the Enforcer 110 as you did on the Soul. Yes, the 110 does better in soft snow, but the 100 is more responsive and holds an edge better on firm snow as it uses less tail rocker. I think you're pretty safe sticking with the Enforcer 100. Should still be plenty wide enough for those deeper powder days, and you're retaining better "resort" performance.
Hope that helps!
SE
Last season I reset and bought two new pairs. I bought a pair of Fischer Pro Mtn 86 175's and a pair of Fischer Ranger 98 Ti 180's. I had demo'd the Enforcers 93's (ultimately went with the Pro Mtn). I demo'd the Atomic Vantage and actually really liked them but had already purchased the Pro Mtn and they were too similar. I actually wish I got the 172's (Rangers) even though I am 6'1" and 210 lbs. I bought the Rangers because of the end of season crud and the occasional heavy snow days. They smear really well and are a lot better than the Pro Mtn in that stuff. I use the Pro Mtn when I just want to stay on groomers and rip. But I found that a shorter ski with lots of rocker, although harder to carve if I do take them out in groomers, plow through pretty much everything and I was a lot more nimble in them. I say all of this to ask what's next? I am planning to do a fair share of glade skiing this season with a few trips planned at Jay. So I was thinking a wider waist and a shorter ski. Was looking at the Atomic Backland, the Enforcer 110's, Kore 105's among some other skis that may be good options. I would also still like to use them occasionally on the groomers. What are your thoughts? Just wanted some professional feedback before I add another pair or two.
Hi David!
Sounds like you're building a pretty sweet quiver. Among the three skis you listed as potential candidates, the Backland (107, I'm assuming) and the Kore 105 are the lighter and more maneuverable. You'll get the best powder and freeride performance out of the Enforcer 110, as it's the widest and most rockered. You'll give up something on the weight with the Enforcer 110, but you get more stability and performance overall. Additionally, if you're looking for a wider ski to round out (or simply expand) your quiver, you might as well get something wider than the Kore 105, especially if you already have a Ranger 98. Everyone who skis on the Enforcer 110 seems to have a really good time on them. As far as groomer performance is concerned, the Kore 105 is better suited than the others, but as long as the corduroy is relatively soft, the Enforcer 110 carves a pretty clean turn. In terms of length, the 185 would most likely be your size based on your height and weight. The long rocker makes them ski a bit short, so you may find the 177 to be on the small side. Hope that helps, and good luck!
SE
I have been skiing the Enforcer 100 in a 177 for 100 plus days in all conditions and absolutely love the ski. I ski in the PNW and the Enforcer 100 is one of the best all around skis I have ever skied. I normally demo a dozen skis each season and haven't skied anything yet that I would consider a better PNW one quiver ski. I am looking for more float in our deep powder days, 12 plus inches of high water content snow, and was wondering if the Enforcer 110 in a 177 would be a good choice. Will the 110 provide noticeably better powder performance than the 100 or should I be looking for something in the 115-120 width for the big powder days? I am 5'9", 150#, prefer skiing off piste and like to turn a lot. Thanks. Really enjoy your reviews.
Sounds like good problems to have Clint!
The added width plus the more turned-up tail of the 110 make a big difference in deep snow over the E100. If you get four feet of snow and are skiing untracked bottomless powder for days on end, you might want to consider something fatter, but in reality, the 110 should be plenty of ski. I like to put it up against the Blizzard Rustler 11, which is a bit wider but a fair comparison. Both skis will give you what you're looking for, and in the deep stuff, it's hard to go wrong with either. The 177 sounds like the right size to me. Happy pow days!
SE
Hi, I've been riding Bonafides in a 187 for several years now. Typically about 10 days/season in Utah, Colorado, or Jackson and the rest is New England(Stowe/Loon/etc). I have race SL and GS in my quiver and the 187 Bonafides. Thinking of the Enforcer 110's or 100's to be a little better in soft snow and a little more maneuverable in tight trees and bumps. I'm 6' 180lbs, not into dropping cliffs but I charge pretty hard on steeps, bumps, and groomers. So, should I stay with the 100's given that I live in the east and typically have luck of the draw snow when I go west? Or, would the 110's be the ticket for all but the most bulletproof days out east, and I have other skis to handle that?
Thinking a 185, even though I never really think of the Bonafides as too long. 193 just seems like a lot for trees and bumps.
Hi Brian!
My first question would be are you going to keep the Bonafides? If you are, that would be reason to go with the 110 as it would round out your quiver better than adding the 100. If you're thinking about replacing your Bonafides, however, I would go with the 100. Quicker edge to edge on firm snow, a little better responsiveness and edge grip because the tail is flatter and stiffer, and just overall a little bit more versatile, especially for eastern terrain. If you do keep the Bonafide, the 110 is a better soft snow ski than the 100, that's for sure. It's also performs reasonably well on firm snow considering how wide it is, so if you do decide to replace your Bonafides, and want that extra soft snow performance, the 110 certainly doesn't feel useless on a groomer day. Also, I agree with length, the 185 cm should be fine for you. Those longer lengths start to become more difficult to maneuver. Heavier swing weight, more ski to keep track of, etc.
Let me know what you think, happy to chat more about it.
SE
I've pretty much made up my mind to get either the 110's or the Pro's but having a hard time making up my mind which way to go. I am an exert aggressive skier 56 grew up skiing White Water in BC (tons of powder) was a competitive bump skier but now am all big mountain. Ski mainly the Backside steep shoots and trees of Lake Louise Alberta with a few trips to Kicking Hoarse BC every year so steep and always looking for the deep. I skied 192 K2 Obseths a couple years (still use for really deep pow days but much to floppy on regular days) so switched to Soul 7's 188 4 years ago and really like them but want something with more edge bite carving ability on the flats and groomers getting to the tows as well as in some of the real narrow shoots that get pretty hard with everyone having to get through them on the steeps. This will be my everyday ski (I'll use the Soul 7's for the rock skies). Look Pivot Bindings on everything I ski since the 80's. What are your thoughts as to which I should go with? Appreciate any input.
Hi Rob!
Having quite a bit of experience on the 110 and the Pro, I would probably go with the 110 if I were you. The Pro is significantly stiffer than the 110, and a whole different league different in flex pattern and performance compared to the Soul 7. The 110 will definitely provide the increased stability, edge grip, and carving performance that you're looking at compared to the Soul 7, but will remain more maneuverable than the Pro overall. I found the Pro was significantly more challenging when making quick movements in tight terrain. It's fun, but it's a stiff ski that demands a lot of skier input at all times.
Look Pivot 18s on the Enforcer 110 is a killer setup. Go for it!
SE
I ride the Line Influence 115's and looking for possibly a new ski to replace my pow boards. I'm considering the Enforcer 110's, as they sound like they are lighter, quicker and probably a little more edge control. I havent got a chance to ride the Enforcer yet, but wanted to get an opinion.
Skiing Dynestar Cham HM in 177cm. 62 years old, 5"8" 180#. (not all muscle! Ha) Intermediate skier but still can get down single black diamonds, tho not pretty. I want to pick up the Enforcer 110 for something different. Do I go with the 169s or the 177s. My wife says I'm not going to get younger. What are your thoughts on length. Thanks.
Hi Rod!
Somehow we must have missed your comment when it came through, our apologies! The Enforcer 110 is great and I think it will be just what you're looking for coming off the Influence 115. Pretty light swing weight, quick and responsive, but also good stability at speed. They're a blast!
SE
Hi Mark!
The 177 cm will work better for your size. 169 cm might feel a little bit short and unstable for your weight. The Enforcer 110 has substantial tip and tail rocker and is relatively forgiving overall, despite its level of performance. You'll be just fine on the 177 cm.
You're only 62 years YOUNG!
Hope that helps,
SE
My question is: How close is the perfomance of the Nordica Enforcer 110 to that of the now extinct Volkl Gotama, which is probably my all-time favorite ski so far? I'm 5'10" and 170 lbs (excluding clothing and ski boots), 79 years young, and an advanced skier who likes an all-mountain ski that is great for powder but fine on the groomed as well. I ski resorts but also skin up using AT bindings. I'm most comfortable on a 177 or 178 cm ski and prefer skis that are NOT espcially stiff.
Hi Otter,
They're fairly similar, although the Gotama was full rocker. So, the feel is a little different, but they accomplish the same thing, so to speak. Both have a good mix of being able to hold an edge and track through choppy snow, but can also release their tail edge and smear pretty easily. They're both, as you put it, great in powder, but also fine on groomers. One of our employees just took a pair of 110s to Alaska with a touring binding on it and skied a huge range of stuff. His trip report will go up on Chairlift Chat this week!
SE
Stuck on my next choice for the quiver. I am 6'1 175lbs and ski Kastle FX94 176 which are great with the family and I push them hard, but looking for something more fun in the soft snow when I get the chance. I am an advanced skier and find myself in the air rarely. Skied the Enforcer 100 and loved it, but don't want to kill the Kastles. Thought about the 110, but would the 104 be the better choice, or mayber the 100? Too many choices!!!!! I ski Mammoth 90% and typically on the upper half of the mountain. The Kastles are great but want more float when I am off-piste in the softer and often chopped snow on Dragons Back, Chutes, Dave's etc. Also looking for size reco for the next pair. Planning on keeping the Kastles. Btw, your guy's reviews and response are great! Cheers, Matthew
Hi Matthew!
If you plan on keeping the 94's I'd go with the 110's. If you're going to get a second pair, I'd go wide. If you're going to have just one, I'd get the 104. The 100 is a great ski for sure, but not quite as playful as the 104, and certainly the 110. I'd go with the 185 in any Enforcer (186 if 104). That's a sweet two-ski quiver!
SE
Hi SE -
Love all of your reviews! Last year I upgraded gear and got Enforcer 93s. I am absolutely loving them. I'm an East-Coaster, and I'm finding that the 93s are fantactic in just about every condition. However, I'm wondering if there is a chance I should need to add a powder ski to my quiver in the coming year or so. If so, I'd like to stay in the Enforcer line, just not sure which width. Since I already have the 93, would the 110 be more appropriate as a powder ski for East Coasters over the 100? Or, maybe the 104?
Thanks!!
Hi Josh!
We're a ski shop, so we're not going to talk you out of getting a second (or third) pair of skis! I think to supplement the 93, you'd have to go up to the 110. I think the 93 to 100 or even 104 is a bit too close. I like to have at least a 10mm gap for supplementary skis to make the purchase worthwhile. They're pretty sweet skis, and you'll love their power and playfulness in the powder. Have fun!
SE
You do such an awesome job on your reviews! I am an expert skier. I am 5'10" and 160 lbs without gear. I ski really fast gs turns. I have no interest in moguls or tree skiing. My quiver includes Rossignol Lt Elite 170cm, Rossignol Experience 100 174cm(could not bend the 180cm to my liking), Salomon Q105 181cm. I am looking for a charging soft snow/powder ski. I use high edge angle carves and only smear out of necessity to slow down. Would the Nordica Enforcer 110 191cm be a good option? The length scares me a little. I know you like the 185cm as well. I've read your review. Any additional thoughts on length or better options for my quiver? Thanks.
Hi Jeff!
Thanks for the kind words! I think the 185 is a better size choice, even though you're out of the trees for the most part. They're still pretty stiff/heavy/damp/stable, so the shorter length won't change those characteristics. The Blizzard Cochise is another solid ski that's not really into smeary turns--more of a high-speed plow ski than a dancer. Same with Volkl Confession--a bit wider and softer than the other skis, but still pretty burly. But at the end of the day, there's nothing wrong with that 110 in the 185! Have fun!
SE
I am 6ft 5in and 275 pds. I am searching for a great all-mountain ski for trips out west. I love skiing trees, steeps, and open bowls... Even with my large size/weight, I get after it out there. I don't mess around with big jumps, cliff hucking, or huge shoots. Nor have I ventured into backcountry skiing at all. Looking for a lightweight but stable ski for all conditions. Hoping to get a ski that won't punish me for being a little less focused at the end of the day too. I am considering Head Kore 105 (107 waist width in their 189cm ski), Rossi Soul 7 HD, Armada Tracer 108, Blizzard Rustler 10, and Nordica Enforcer 110. I have a 2011 Elan Chainsaw that is less than stellar on groomers and hardpack due to its large waist (112mm) and old age. I convinced myself that I wanted a ski that performed better on groomers, but I'm much too afraid to go below a 105mm waisted ski for fear of my weight ruining the skis ability to float in soft snow. Are my fears justified? Would the Enforcer provide both float and solid hard pack performance at my given height/weight? I also gravitate towards the enforcer due to its length (191) verses the other ski mentioned above (most are at 188cm)? Will take all suggestions and feedback. Thank you!
Zach
Hi Zach!
Sounds like you're looking for a wider ski with metal. I'd take the Kore and the Soul off the list, as they're pretty light. The Tracer, even without metal, is a stronger performer from tip to tail, so I'd keep that one for further consideration. The Rustler has a partial metal laminate, so it'll hold up better on-trail, while retaining soft snow and powder capabilities. As the widest and most-metal ski, the Enforcer 110 is as strong as it is agile. At your size, I think this is the way to go. You could certainly use the wider shape for more flotation. I'd say the 191 is the way to go. Also just to keep in mind, the Ruster comes in the 11 as well, and in a 192. Hope that helps!
SE
Thanks for your awesome reviews. You guy are the best on the web and have been my goto resource for research.
I'm 5'10' and 185lbs currently riding some 10+ year old Rossi Ravens 140/110/134 191 cm length. I'm an advanced skier living in North Vancouver, skiing Whistler, the heavy snow on the locals mtns and BC interior. I love to carve the high speed groomers when there is no fresh snow but look for every opportunity to find fresh tracks in the trees. Chasing my boys has been increasingly difficult as they get better flying through the tight trees and I get older. So I'm looking for a ski to be quick and easy in the trees and fast on the groomers.
Currently my top 2 are the Enforcer 110 (I can't decide on length - 177 or 184?) and the Rustler 11's 180cm.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated?
Thanks
Barty B
Thanks for the props, Barty!
The biggest differences are the amount of metal and the seeming "roundness" of turns. With two full sheets of metal, the Enforcer 110 is a pretty stable ski. However, the rounder turn shape makes it a pretty capable carver, and it lays some seriously deep trenches. I found the Rustler 11 to be more of a straight-line ski that loved to go fast and held a decent edge, but wasn't quite as playful as the Enforcer. I'd go with the 185 in the Enforcer versus the shorter length. Hope that helps!
SE
Hey Gents - great work you do here. I’m 51 years old, 6’ 3” and 216lbs. Took about a 10 year break from skiing, but I’m back! I ski mostly Mammoth and June Mountain, but also occasionally Tahoe, possibly Big Bear now that my 10 year old son in getting into skiing. I used to be a charger anywhere but moguls, now I am with my son most of the time, which currently means groomers. I need a ski that I can play with on the groomers going casually or bombing down after him if I give him a sizable head start! I’m a strong, athletic skier - expert terrain but not as pretty or polished as some of the Mammoth locals.
For reference I Have old Rossignol Bandit XX’s (194’s I think? Bought new in 1999!!) that I finally retired. I had no issue with Dave’s run, etc on them in 2018 control wise, but they are toast. Last year I put 180 and 187 Bonafides Demos thru the paces. The 180’s looked tiny to me, but they were unfazed when I let them run a bit (I didn’t have a chance to bomb) without any speed limit. I skied the 187’s and they weren’t as lively, especially going slow on the groomers, but I had no issue with the length. Just more work. I know they would be even more solid really bombing it. I can handle the challenge, but those straight down drop ins are probably a thing of the past.
Looking at the Enforcer 110’s as my one ski quiver. Should I go with the 185 or the 191?
I had those same Bandit XX's same year!
I'm about the same size as you, and have been conflicted with this size break as well. I currently own a K2 Pinnacle 105 in the 191 and I think it's just about right. There's a few days when I want the 184 for trees or tighter terrain, but overall, I like the longer length, especially in open areas. Overall I don't think the few times that I wished for the shorter length outweigh the majority of the time that I'm fine and happy with the 191. Hope that helps!
SE
Hi, Love your reviews. I’m going to buy new skis in next couple weeks, and I’m trying to decide between the Nordic’s Enforcer 110 and K2 Mindbender 108. I ski in Fernie, BC, so lots of powder days and usually in the trees. Wondering what’s your opinion between the two with regards to skiing in trees and also skiing through track powder and crud? Also is one more easy to ski, like does one take more effect and will tire you out faster. Thanks, Ed.
HI Ed!
The biggest difference between those models is the turn shape. The Enforcer likes to make rounder turns while the K2 prefers a straighter line. The turned-up tail of the Enforcer makes it easier to release the turn, so it's likely to be easier on the body. Hope that helps!
SE
Great reviews and content, thanks guys! I’m looking to update to something more modern than my 2011 Volkl Bridges, and these seem like they’d be great all-arounders for my trips west (Alyeska, Jackson, Etc.). As I’ve gotten older, I’m less concerned with freestyle traits, but still definitely like the occasional cliff drop, lip, kicker, 3, or 180. Can you elaborate a little more on how these are in the air and/or spinning? Any mounting point considerations?
Hi Dan!
I loved my Bridges! I felt a lot of similarities, especially in their preference for rounder turns. In the air, the metal's going to slow you down for sure in a spinning application. For straight drops, I don't see any issues there. Unless you're really looking for a more playful and buttery ski, I'd stick to the manufacturers standard mount point for the best all-around performance. Have fun!
SE
I had to remount my Enforcer 110 bindings. The best I could do is the boot mark is 1/4" back of the ski mark. How will this affeck my skiing?
Thanks
DP
Hi DP!
Not much of an effect, I'd say--probably a bit more floaty in the fresh, but that's about it. Have fun!
SE